14:23 and 14:29 are absolutely the two bars needing special attention. They may be the two most important bars on this whole sequence.
14:23 Bar — Very Important
This is a classic candidate reversal long trigger bar.
What I see:
Delta +16,760 (very large)
But more important:
- Huge aggressive buying enters from lows.
- Price rejects lower area around support.
- Lower auction looks repaired.
- Multiple signs of responsive buyers stepping in.
This is not random positive delta.
It has:
- Exhaustion after prior selling
- Responsive buy defense
- Reclaim of value
- Possible seller trap
GOMI read:
This is a legitimate long signal bar.
Why it matters:
This is not “buying imbalance continuation.”
This is:
Reversal from failed downside auction.
Very different.
Trade idea from 14:23
Long above bar acceptance.
Entry:
Above reclaim around 646–648.
Stop:
Below 635 structure.
Targets:
655
660
664
Excellent setup.
What makes 14:23 especially bullish?
Effort vs result works properly here.
Aggressive buyers came in
AND price responded.
That’s real initiative.
Not absorption.
Huge distinction.
14:29 — Special Attention (Even Bigger)
This one is fascinating.
Delta +14,640
but...
-3900 and -4040 negative signatures near lows
This screams conflict.
My read:
This looks much more like selling climax / trap bar than clean trend bar.
Look at the anatomy:
- Vertical liquidation down into green support.
- Massive negative flush.
- Yet bar ends in support.
- Lower prices attract heavy response.
This has "stop-run exhaustion" written all over it.
Textbook possibility:
Terminal flush into support.
Potential:
- Seller capitulation
- Exhaustion low
- Reversal candidate
This may be another GOMI long setup.
Why 14:29 deserves special caution
It can fool traders both ways:
Wrong bearish read:
“Massive sell pressure, short breakdown.”
Danger:
You may short into exhaustion.
Better read:
Ask:
Did selling get acceptance below support?
Looks like:
No.
That favors exhaustion.
Comparing 14:23 vs 14:29
14:23
Cleaner long.
- Structured
- Confirmed
- Higher quality
Grade:
A setup
14:29
More violent,
more climactic,
higher reward,
but trickier.
Grade:
A- / advanced setup
If I were trading professionally:
At 14:23
I’d initiate long.
At 14:29
I would not short that breakdown.
I’d actually look for:
- unfinished auction low
- failed breakdown
- reversal confirmation next bar
Possibly add/re-enter long.
Very important difference
14:23
"Initiative buyers take control"
14:29
"Forced sellers may be exhausted"
Different orderflow events.
Both bullish,
but for different reasons.
My honest caution:
14:27–14:28
I see signs of buying absorption / possible distribution before the drop.
That may have warned of 14:29 flush.
Very educational sequence.
My professional bias:
- 14:23 = textbook buy
- 14:29 = do NOT chase short; likely fade-the-flush long candidate
I would have been far more interested buying 14:29 panic than selling it.
My favorite tell at 14:29:
Selling gets huge…
yet finishes back in support.
That often means sellers sold the low.
Classic trap.